THEGREENGROK

Climate Change: North Carolinians Hope to Stop It in Its Tracks


by Bill Chameides | May 22nd, 2012
posted by Erica Rowell (Editor)

Permalink | 6 comments
With much at stake for North Carolina's low-lying coast, including much of the Outer Banks, rising sea levels could be the state's greatest climate-change threat. But it seems some prefer the science of sea-level rise be left out of plans and such. (NOAA)
With much at stake for North Carolina's low-lying coast, including much of the Outer Banks, rising sea levels could be the state's greatest climate-change threat. But it seems some prefer the science of sea-level rise be left out of plans and such. (NOAA)

Legislation would just plain do away with global warming.

Government: too big or not big enough. It’s a hot-button issue this election season. Lots of politicians think that government has gotten too big and powerful and needs to be cut down to size. Others see government as an agent of good and argue for more governmental power. Apparently nowhere is the latter sentiment more alive than in the halls of the North Carolina Legislature. Most politicians work to legislate the laws of society; in North Carolina some politicians hope to legislate the laws of nature. If that ain’t governmental power, I don’t know what is. 

The story begins with sea-level rise along the North Carolina coast.

Sea-Level Rise and North Carolina

The greatest threat that climate change poses to North Carolina could very well be sea-level rise. Some 2,250 square miles of the state’s broad, low-lying coastal plain (or twice the land mass of Rhode Island) lie at an elevation of just five feet (1.5 meter) or less above sea level. Much of both the Outer Banks and the coastal plain sandwiched between the Albemarle and Pamlico Sounds lie at one meter or less. (See elevation map.)

With sea level on the rise, the already tenuous system of bridges and roads linking the state’s famed barrier islands to the mainland becomes even more imperiled and costly to maintain. Ultimately, sea-level rise could sound the death knell for much of the state’s economic investments along the coast.

In recognition of these facts, the North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission asked a science panel to study the problem and make recommendations. With plenty of caveats about uncertainties and such, the panel recommended [pdf] that “a rise of 1 meter (39 inches) be adopted as the amount of anticipated rise by 2100, for policy development and planning purposes.” (A summary of the panel’s work and its reception by the State Legislature can be found here. Full report here [pdf].)

The Battle Is Joined, Sea Level … Enjoined

It turns out that a projected sea-level rise of about one meter over the next 90 years or so is just plain unacceptable to certain North Carolinian factions. One such group, calling itself the NC-20 (for the 20 coastal counties its members supposedly hail from), is being driven, some have speculated, by coastal developers who fear that state and local policies based on such a rise in sea level would put the kibosh on their plans to build new condos, subdivisions, hotels, and the like.

According to the group’s website, NC-20 “concentrate[s] primarily on actions to prevent regulation and rule making not based on science, to establish or maintain fairness in State funding (e.g. DOT), and to oppose predatory pricing in the areas of homeowners and dwelling insurance.”

Apparently, even though the findings of the panel were based on science, they crossed the line of acceptability for NC-20 and so the group decided to work to quash the science panel’s report. Such efforts are proudly described in an NC-20 report [pdf] entitled “Sea Level Rise: The Story from Beginning to End.” It trumpets the group’s “substantial victory with over-zealous State bureaucrats who were attempting to impose a 39″ sea level rise planning mandate on all NC 20 counties.”

According to NC-20, once the dust settled, the Coastal Resources Commission dismissed the science panel’s findings. As best as I can tell, this is not literally true but pretty close. The commission has not actually dismissed the science panel’s report, per se. It has simply directed one of its committees to prepare a planning document based on the report but without any mention of accelerating sea-level rise.

State Legislature Gets Into Act

So impressed with the ability of NC-20 to put an end to sea-level rise single-handed, the North Carolina Senate decided to go one step further and legislate it away.

In late April a revised version of a bill from the state House surfaced in the Senate that would enshrine NC-20’s view. This new bill [pdf] would:

  • limit sea-level rise to historical rates circa 1900,
  • specify that sea-level rise may be extrapolated linearly to estimate future rates of rise, and
  • disallow consideration of scenarios with accelerated rates of sea-level rise.

Should this legislation come to fruition, North Carolina would be planning for a sea-level rise of about one foot rather than the scientifically projected three feet by the end of the century. That leaves a whole lot of water unaccounted for. And it could leave whole communities up coastal creeks paying for roads and bridges that no longer make sense to maintain in the face of rising seas.

As of this writing, the jury’s still out on the sea-level bill’s fate. All this time I’ve been worrying about what will happen to my kids as a result of climate change. It was clear to me that we needed some really innovative, out-of-the-box solutions. Turns out we can just legislate it away. Big government to the rescue.

filed under: climate change, coasts, faculty, global warming, policy, politics
and: , , , , , , ,

6 Comments

All comments are moderated and limited to 275 words. Your e-mail address is never displayed. Read our Comment Guidelines for more details.

  1. Laura Sandvik
    Jun 7, 2012

    Today HB819 is going to the Ag/Env/NR Committee. If (inter)national ridicule doesn’t work perhaps North Carolinians should let their legislators know exactly how awful this denial is: Change.org petition North Carolina’s General Assembly: Do not pass NC HB 819 Coastal Management Policies

  2. drumman
    Jun 6, 2012

    Before casting too many stones, the dean should look into the role one of his adjunct professors, Jeff Warren, has played in all this. As a senior policy advisor in the N.C. Senate, Warren, who has degrees in geology, wrote the bill that now has achieved the distinction of being ridiculed the world over.

  3. Sarah @ Green Global Travel
    Jun 3, 2012

    Don’t you know the government can fix everything! Next they’ll stop sea level rise by wishing it away.

  4. Nancy
    May 26, 2012

    We all have our head in the Sand. I like Dr. Riggs idea of turning hattaras into a string of Okacrokes – with a ferry system and eastern North Carolina into a eco-tourism – come see our swamps.

  5. Joel Taylor
    May 23, 2012

    What if the risks of sea level rising were transferred to developers and ultimately to those who propose developing or owning property, living or running businesses in the at-risk areas? If they do not accept the science, let us not make that the issue. Choose an agreed-upon benchmark or metric for the current sea level. Then by mutual agreement work out the contract language that transfers the economic costs and liabilities of sea level rising to those who choose to develop and live in the at-risk coastal regions. Put that language in the property entitlement documentation. One wonders how the actuarians at the property and casualty insurers are accounting for these risks already?

  6. Jim
    May 23, 2012

    Or what’s left of the sand in the Outer Banks. I just laughed when I saw this, it literally is like something out of some over the top comedy show. Anything you don’t like, just pretend it’s not there! I’ve stopped being so scared of the tea party, now I just laugh. It’s all so ludicrous.

Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University | Box 90328 | Durham, NC 27708
how to contact us > | login to the site >

footer nav stuff