Business Leaders Weigh In on Environmental Regulations

by Bill Chameides | June 25th, 2010
posted by Erica Rowell (Editor)

Permalink | 1 comment

Everyone knows environmental regulations are bad for business. Maybe not.

Last Wednesday I found myself in Washington D.C., at a meeting of the Council on Competitiveness for the launch of its U.S. Manufacturing Competitiveness Initiative.

At a press conference before the meeting the council released the results of a global business survey of some 400+ international executives used by the council to develop an index of the factors that influence manufacturing competitiveness.

Following the release, and armed with the results of the survey, we began work on the new initiative — aimed at developing a road map to make America more competitive in manufacturing in the global marketplace.

U.S. Lagging Behind in Competitiveness

There was a lot of handwringing over the fact that the United States was ranked fourth in overall competitiveness behind China (first), India (second), and South Korea (third), and was projected to fall to fifth in five years with Brazil taking over the #4 slot.

As noted in the press release, there was also a lot of discussion over the fact that “access to talented workers who are capable of supporting innovation is the key factor driving global competitiveness at manufacturing companies — well ahead of ‘classic’ factors typically associated with competitive manufacturing, such as labor, materials and energy.”

Another aspect of the index that I found noteworthy but that was largely ignored by the group is worth bringing up here. It relates to business leaders’ perception of the role of environmental regulations in affecting manufacturing competitiveness.

Do Environmental Regs Really Depress American Competitiveness? What CEOs Say …

I don’t know how many times I’ve heard people bemoan all the environmental regulations imposed on U.S. industry — gripes claiming regulations increase costs, depress efficiency, and are a hassle to comply with, and eventually chase manufacturers out of the country to locales less environmentally restrictive. (See here, here and here) Really? Let’s see what the chief executive officers polled in the survey had to say.

American CEOs and other executives were asked in the poll to identify the government policies that give the United States a competitive advantage or disadvantage in manufacturing relative to other nations. At the top of the advantage list were U.S. laws that protect intellectual property, and in the disadvantage list were government intervention and ownership of companies and corporate tax policies.

But what about those supposedly nasty, purportedly bad-for-business environmental regulations? The CEOs said they were not a significant factor: they neither enhanced competitiveness nor significantly detracted from it. So much for that long-lived, widely spread myth.

China’s Green Movement and Competitiveness

Another interesting statistic came from the survey of Chinese business leaders on the policies that enhance their nation’s competitiveness. Near the top of their list on competitive advantages: their government’s “sustainability policies,” i.e., China’s push to develop and manufacture renewable energy technologies.

And I thought subsidies and government programs that artificially push green technologies were supposed to be bad for business. (See here and here.) Seems China’s CEOs think not.

Now I’m sure there’ll be folks who will challenge these results. That’s fine. Just bear in mind that your beef is with the CEOs of the world, not with this humble academic.

filed under: business, economy, faculty, policy, politics
and: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

All comments are moderated and limited to 275 words. Your e-mail address is never displayed. Read our Comment Guidelines for more details.

  1. Jim
    Jun 25, 2010

    Many companies have wanted climate legislation for years. The fact that the climate legislation has been in flux, stagnated, then not, different proposals, etc. makes it very difficult for companies to plan for it. They say if it’s coming, let it come, not knowing makes things more difficult. As things stand now, if legislation is not forthcoming, then the EPA will start regulating CO2, which industry is definitley against. Also, there is a push world wide to move to renewable and sustainable energy production. If the US doesn’t have more incentive for companies to move that way, spurring innovation, the the US will continue to fall behind in this growing industry. Why doesn’t congress get it? Both the majority of industry and citizens are for some sort of climate legislation, it seems only congress is against it.

©2015 Nicholas School of the Environment at Duke University | Box 90328 | Durham, NC 27708
how to contact us > | login to the site > | site disclaimers >

footer nav stuff